Quite a bit is happening tomorrow night at the Lummi Island Ferry Advisory Committee meeting (6:30-7:40, District 11 Firehall, Lummi Island). Here’s the agenda: LIFAC agenda 2016-05-03
Here is last year’s County’s request for proposals for temporary ferry service. This service is the County’s (our) backup plan for temporary, including emergency and dry dock service when the Chief is unavailable. My understanding is that the County’s award of the contract was challenged legally by a few islanders, a challenge that failed.
Some islanders see no need Read More »
Here’s Stu Clark’s (chair) report on the LIFAC March 1, 2016 meeting (not included: Agenda; brief bios of members Bailey, Blake and Forbes). A key action was the vote to ensure that the County’s 20 yr Comprehensive (Comp) Plan recogizes the Lummi Island Ferry system as an essential ‘arterial’ road that requires ‘concurrency’ of future transportation and growth/development. Read More »
Isaac Colgen posted a brief history (with great photos) of ferries to Lummi Island on the site he manages, Lummi-island.com. All of his stories there have been interesting, highlighting a range of island activities and people.
Below is a concise report on what happened last night’s Lummi Island Ferry Advisory Committee (LIFAC) meeting. It’s just a quick report, not approved minutes. Stu Clark sent it out by email today (Feb. 3). Stu is the newly elected LIFAC chairperson. Other newly elected officers and members are listed in the report. The report provides a quick look- ahead to topics for the March 1 meeting. My sincere thanks to LIFAC for getting these out so quickly! Read More »
Much is happening with LIFAC right now: progress on long term planning for a replacement ferry, 3 new committee members, election of officers at Tuesday’s meeting. So far, Nancy Ging is the only person I’ve heard of who’s thrown her hat in the ring for chairperson, Read More »
The Lummi Island Ferry Advisory Committee (LIFAC) has made public its draft report on ferry level of service LIFAC LOS Project Part 1 Report – DRAFT 12-01-2015. This report is part of their co-operative planning with Public Works re: replacement of the Whatcom Chief. Included are definitions, history and more about what ‘ferry level of service’ is and how it is defined by Whatcom County. This is a substantive document with considerable detail and comparisons to other WA ferry systems. Public comments on the document and issues are welcome, and can be submitted in writing to email@example.com or at the next LIFAC meeting in January (tentatively, January 5). Read More »
Why review the ferry Level of Service (LOS) now? LIFAC and Public Works are currently exploring the County’s ferry LOS history and options as part of their brief to advise the County Council on a replacement of the Whatcom Chief at some future time.
What is a “Level of Service”, anyway? In Washington state, LOS is the legal term for how a county, city or other governmental entity defines what it deems ‘acceptable traffic flow’ on roads, ferries etc. They do this supposedly to help plan for the transportation infrastructure that will ‘accommodate’ projected changes in population and development. The Washington Growth Management Act (1993) requires transportation infrastructure planning to be part of required comprehensive land use planning to accommodate projected growth. The notion is that transportation infrastructure plans should be ‘concurrent’ with development.
Sometime in the 1990s, Whatcom County assigned our ferry system a ‘ferry LOS’ as part of its the ‘transportation concurrency’ part of its comprehensive plan. The current ferry LOS was defined (I think) as the total # of people and/or vehicles transported annually/# island residents, measured at some past point in time.
Does the ferry or any other LOS matter? Defining a traffic LOS doesn’t necessarily mean that traffic flow is kept ‘reasonable’ from the drivers’ perspective. That’s because local governments can define ‘acceptable’ a traffic LOS, either overall or at specific times (e.g., commute times) that allows very heavily congested roads etc. So what if the government entity doesn’t have or want to spend more monies to to increase its transportation infrastructure, and if neither developers nor taxpayers are willing to pay more for improvements that would keep traffic congestion down? Well, they can simply lower the ‘acceptable’ LOS, resulting in more traffic congestion as development and population increase.
Examples of ‘traffic planning’ via LOS (best appreciated by those who’ve been in Whatcom County 10+ years). Guide Meridian, especially at rush hour is definitely worse now than 10 years ago. Looking ahead, think about traffic at the Bakerview Road/I5 interchange as Costco, more apartments, more stores, and more hotels are built, plus (maybe) more airport traffic. Or, consider how traffic has worsened between Seattle and Marysville as the northward population has grown. Yes, some changes have been made to roads, but traffic is still way more congested than it was.
I’m glad LIFAC and Public Works are exploring ideas about changes in island population and the ferry system that might ‘accommodate’ population projections. But I’ve no illusions that any LOS they recommend as ‘reasonable’ will result in an increased numbers of runs or a larger ferry with more vehicle capacity that might keep car traffic flowing as well as it does now.
Below is the notice of the next LIFAC meeting / worksession on the ferry ‘level of service’. On Facebook (or somewhere) I read that that Rich Hudson, the Chief’s new Senior Master, will attend this meeting, at least briefly. Note that, as usual, brief (3 minute) public comments will be taken at the start of the meeting.
Sent: Nov 27, 2015 2:52 PM
To: LIFAC Announcements
Cc: LIFAC Members
Subject: [LIFAC Announcements] LIFAC Meeting Announcement for Dec. 1 , 2015
Lummi Island Ferry Advisory Committee (LIFAC) will hold it’s regular meeting this month on Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2015, at 6:30 PM. The meeting will be held in the Lummi Island Fire Hall.
This will be a work session largely devoted to reviewing the Level of Service (LOS) Work Plan. As always, there will be an Open Session for receiving public comments.
Thank you for your interest.
To contact LIFAC, send message to: firstname.lastname@example.org
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “LIFAC Announcements” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to email@example.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To contact LIFAC, send message to: firstname.lastname@example.org
from Whatcom County Public Works, via Mike McKenzie, Chairperson of LIFAC.
Rich Hudson has been selected as the new Senior Master to captain the Whatcom Chief. He fills the vacated position created by Fred Nyland’s retirement, effective Dec. 1. “Richie has some great ideas, and we’re excited to have him in this role,” said Rob Ney, PW director of special projects.”
Here’s the process used to make the selection. It differs greatly from the previous criteria of just seniority,