Islander’s Concerns, Questions & Recommendations

From: Richard Frye
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:21 AM
Subject: Lummi Ferry recommendation

Dear Council Members,
For reasons that are obscure, the Council seems committed to the path it set out upon four years ago of annual increases in ferry fares to meet an arbitrary goal of covering 55% of “operating costs,” where said “operating costs” are in themselves an arbitrary and moving target seemingly devoid of accountability.

Lummi Island residents are made up of roughly one third retirees, one third island-employed, and one third commuters. All chose to live here based on economic calculations that included reasonable expectations that ferry fares and service would remain somewhere near historic levels. Each group has been hurt in different ways by each fare increase, but these latest proposals will have devastating consequences. The most basic fact before your eyes is that huge fare increases every year are NOT “reasonable expectations.” If you need a point of comparison, imagine how your life would be impacted if the price of gasoline were to increase by $2 a gallon, and just as you adjust your lifestyle they go up another $2 the next year, and the next, and the next. How would that affect the decisions you had made about where you live, where you work, your arrangements with suppliers, or whether your customers can afford to do business with you?

Everyone on Lummi Island is already stretched to the limit by the previous fare increases, which have already surpassed reasonable expectations. For retirees on fixed incomes, higher fares mean careful planning to combine shopping and medical trips. Island businesses have to compete with mainland businesses, and higher fares mean higher costs for both suppliers and customers. And of course constantly increasing fares forces commuters to reevaluate their decisions to live here, just as doubling or tripling the price of gas would affect your decision to live and work where you do. Additional fare increases of the magnitude proposed will have profound social and economic impacts. You need to find another way to address the financial challenges of running the ferry.

Over recent years you have been quick to raise fares in attempts to raise revenue, but have done little to rein in costs, which have grown far in excess of either the general price index or historic levels. The absolutely primary focus of the Council should be on a line item analysis and audit of ferry costs to find out exactly why they have grown so dramatically. Why are so many capital repairs and replacements included as operating expenses? Why aren’t they amortized over time as they should be? Why are we paying such huge administrative costs? How can costs be reduced? Why aren’t you focusing on cost reduction and accurate accounting?

Richard Frye
Lummi Island

4 thoughts on “Islander’s Concerns, Questions & Recommendations

  1. Thanks Rich for stepping up to the plate, even though they keep changing pitchers on you, and then they only throw curves and screwballs.
    … and they keep turning the power off to the scoreboard.

  2. Yes Rich,

    $850K in the year 2000, to a Ferry Budget of $2.5 million for 2010?

    I believe it’s a National Issue, going back a long time ago, during an early version of a Tea Party, as it’s instrumental specialist wrote;

    “It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.”
    Samuel Adams

    The Funding Game, by Whatcom County now being played in your sinking ship of state.

    A great previous example,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s