Road right-of-way to Lummi Island

Tip Johnson wrote and submitted this as a comment to Stuart’s April 10th piece on ferry costs and service.  I’m re-posting it here to make it easier for people to find, since comments aren’t searchable.  Wynne


“Affordable fares and full ferry service” are unlikely under a negotiated lease between the County and the Lummi Nation. Indeed, as you say, “the current lease negotiations are being conducted in a manner that serves only the interests of Whatcom County government and Lummi Nation.” That’s because they are the only ones negotiating! And because the County is hampered by legal complexities beyond their financial means. It is infeasible to settle these issues in court. Whatcom County cannot afford to litigate against the executive branch of the US government.

I think it is time for Islanders to commence their own negotiations. This should eventually include the Lummi Nation, but my initial efforts to feel them out on a new, mutually beneficial approach has gone without reply. That means Lummi Islanders will need to get their attention first. It also means they are well aware of their advantage and its weaknesses.

County contacts have been much more receptive, indicating they, too, understand their weaknesses. Unfortunately, the County doesn’t have any inherent advantages – and they understand this, too.

I have finished reading roughly seven archive boxes of relevant documents provided in response to a disclosure request.

Do island folks understand that a road through the reservation to access Lummi Island has been approved by the Department of the interior three times? That the County has bought right-of-ways twice, and the State approved them twice? That the Secretary of the Interior approved the first lease and that the second lease was stipulated by consent decree in federal court? That only the evolution of federal policy and administrative oversight has created the opportunity for the Lummi Nation to capitalize on the bottleneck through the tidelands?

Ironically, history is the essential weakness of the Lummi Nation’s posture. The ferry has operated here for a century, but people have ferried to and from Lummi Island at this location for millenia. That’s because there is no feasible alternative. That is islanders’ key strength.

I’m a bit of an outsider but would like to propose a completely new approach to the right island people in the right island context.


3 thoughts on “Road right-of-way to Lummi Island

  1. I spoke with Tip last week before the PLIC meeting. He said that he hoped that PLIC might pursue this option, as part of a ‘dual-pronged’ approach to affordable service to Gooseberry Pt. Sounds like a good strategic approach too me, especially since the GHT lawyers at the island meeting (early February?) said that although they lacked, at that time, full information about the road right-of-way (and thought that a lease agreement would be easier to move forward) they thought that the road right-of-way from the mainland to Lummi Island should at least be used as leverage to negotiate the best possible lease.

  2. We also should be concerned about the relocation of the ferry dock as the Lummi Nation wants to do.
    I would think the right of way we may have now would no longer exist.

  3. Hey Tip –

    Yours is the best understanding of the issue that I have heard so far. I like placing this in a historical context so that we can better understand the situation in its full context. This is a great step one. Now what should we be doing for step two? Your thinking on this is very important. Let’s hear it!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s